The Plot Against Social Security
Title: ACHIEVING A “LENINIST” STRATEGY
Cato Journal, vol. 3, no.2 (Fall 1983) copyright © Cato Institute.
It began in 1982 at the "Rebuilding Social Security" Conference at the radical-right Heritage Foundation, but the plot against Social Security was fleshed out by Butler (a Cato director) and Germanis (an analyist at Heritage) in the Fall 1983 issue of Cato's journal, summarized through quotes here: [Emphasis added.]
"Lenin recognized that fundamental change is contingent upon ... its success in isolating and weakening its opponents. ... we would do well to drawa few lessons from the Leninist strategy. (p. 547)
"we must recognize that we need more than a manifesto ... we must ... construct ... a coalition that will ... reap benefits from the IRA-based private system Ferrara has proposed but also the banks, insurance companies, and ... that will gain from providing such plans to the public." (p. 548)
By approaching the problem in this way, we may be ready for the next crisis in Social Security. (p. 548)
"From a purely political standpoint, it should be remembered that the elderly represent a very powerful and vocal interest group. (p. 549)
A Plan of Action
"The first element consists of a campaign to achieve small legislative changes that embellish the present IRA system, making it in practice a small-scale private Social Security system. ... the natural constituency for an enlarged IRA system must be ... welded into a coalition for political change. (p. 551)
"The second main element ... involves what one might crudely call guerrilla warfare against both the current Social Security system and the coalition that supports it. (p. 552)
Creating a Private Model
"The reason for designing a “super IRA” law with these restrictions is purely political." (p. 552)
"Social Security reform requires mobilizing the various coalitions that stand to benefit from the change, ... the business community, and financial institutions in particular ... (p. 553)
"The banking industry and other business groups that can benefit from expanded IRAs ...
"... the strategy must be to propose moving to a private Social Security system in such a way as to ... neutralize, ... the coalition that supports the existing system. (p. 555)
But then, as Lenin well knew, to be a successful revolutionary, one must also be patient and consistently plan for real reform. (Concluding sentence, p. 556)


4 Comments:
Hi Paul,
Made it to DC and visited several congressmen today. The hostel has internet access at $1 for ten minutes. I guess that's pretty good. :) I'm not sure I am accomplishment much here today, but I did drop into several offices and encouraged some good guys. :)
Just 12 minutes left. Better go check my email.
1/19/2005 07:34:00 PM
"either way what gives you the right to block us when the proposal is "optional" ? .. I call it OBSTRUCTING !!!"
The right is the right to challenge.
I know it seems strange to you but that's how Democracy works.
No one, not a single man woman or child in this country is prevented from saving for retirement separate from Social Security - in fact much of it can already be done tax deferred.
So the Republican proposal is a boondogle - a false falg operation INTENDED to undermine Social Security, a valid program established for a valid purpuse, one that fits right in with our governments charter to provide for the general welfare.
Your Furer failed in his attempt to destroy Social Security, even with a Republithug Congress and we can thank good men and women in Congress for that.
10/13/2007 10:55:00 PM
God Damn your man for what he has done to this nation.
10/13/2007 10:56:00 PM
Oh and for anyone coming along later as I did and finding dubyaluvsya's stuff tucked in and about through the archives - he did a lot of vandalizing in the short time he operated under that name.
10/13/2007 10:58:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home